What if the criteria were set up so that best would equal most interesting, or most unusual, or most beneficial. In all cases this may not be the most likeable person. If we take the BIG FIVE personality traits: openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism, and then create some kind of consituent criteria using these, that would make this choice a little more meaningful. Each item could be scored on a scale of 1 (low) to 3 (high) depending on how characteristic this trait is of the person. Here is han example of how the criteria might look:
Openness
__ active imagination
__ aesthetic sensitivity
__ attentiveness to inner feelings
__ preference for variety
__ intellectual curiostiy
Conscientiousness
__ self-disciplined
__ carefulness
__ thoroughness
__ organization
__ deliberation
__ deliberation
__ need for achievment
Extraversion
__ gregarious
__ assertive
__ generally seeking excitement
Agreeableness
__ empathetic
__ considerate
__ friendly
__ friendly
__ generous
__ helpful
Neuroticism (lack of)
__ emotionally stable
__ less reactive to stress
__ calm
__ even tempered
__ less likely to feel tense or rattled
This is Big Frank's list of desirable traits. Your list might be different. For example - you might like introverts better - in that case just substitute for the above three: reserved, less outgoing, and less sociable. A similar substitution could take place for the others. In the end you have a scoring system in which 72 is the top possible score. This person would be BEST PERSONALITY. This could be used in beauty contests, and it could also be used to evaluate friends, relatives, potential dates, and in gossip. For example, if you said that so-and-so was a 13 everyone would know that he/she had a rotten personality; whereas a 60 would be someone that you could say with some assurance had a good personality. Let's hope that this system is used more often - it would certainly let people know what "good personality" meant. Try scoring yourself so that when you meet people you can shorten the time it takes to know people by exchanging personality scores, e.g., I'm a 57 what are you?
2 comments:
You have missed the mark on this one, Big Frank. Whether you like someone is not a mathematical or analytical assessment. It is an intuitive process not subject to precise analysis. People need to trust their intuition and not try to compartmentalize it, or over analyze it. It's jus that simple.
OK,you make your own judgement about someone's personality intuitively. However, try to explain to someone else why you think someone else has a "good personality". Can't be done - and that is where the rating system that Big Frank proposes comes int. You can say, "She/he has a great personality - she's a 58!" Then they think: "Wow - that is great!" Otherwise it has no objective reality for anyone else.
Post a Comment